(click
here for archives of reports)
April 2005
Executive Summary

Surprise!
Some Local Business Acceleration in the First Quarter
Greater
Lansing Business Index: 120.0
Prepared
by David G. Sowerby, CFA
Loomis, Sayles & Company, LP
Lansing-area economic activity moderately gained
in the first quarter. The Greater Lansing Business
Index rose to a preliminary level of 120.0 in March
compared with 115.7 at the end of 2004. Although the
index was slightly higher than December 2004 levels,
the local business climate is approximately unchanged
compared with year ago levels.
Over three years into a national economic recovery,
there has been little sign that Michigan and Lansing
have participated with any meaningful growth. In early
April, the latest jobless figures put the state at
6.9 percent. In comparison, the U.S. unemployment
rate is 5.4 percent.
More than any statistic, the unemployment rate registers
as the highest profile economic measure among average
Americans. Professionals know that the unemployment
rate is a lagging variable that is usually one of
the slowest gauges to witness improvement in an economic
recovery. This has especially been the case in Midwest
states as a global competitiveness has necessitated
corporate restructuring into a recovery. Recently,
job growth has been improving at the national level
and slightly, within Michigan.
In this expansion, there is arguably one of the greatest
polarizations of growth nationally versus locally
in the last 40 years. The cause is both cyclical and
structural. Of the two, there is better news coming
on the cyclical front, as the following key measures
should enhance local economic prospects:
STATE OF MICHIGAN AND METRO LANSING BUSINESS BALANCE
SHEET – APRIL 2005
- Corporate Michigan – remains healthy
- State revenue growth accelerating
- Exports improving, imports slowing due to dollar
depreciation
- State tax climate competitive
- Above average GDP growth traditionally favors
Michigan job and income growth
Data Source: Loomis,
Sayles & Company, LP
Indeed, there are greater signs that the cyclical
recovery is improving for the regional and local business
environment. Local area corporate earnings should
witness a 20 percent gain in 2005, even when including
the recent profit estimate reductions for several
auto companies. Retail spending has expanded above
average in the face of high-energy prices, perhaps
owing to household net worth reaching record levels
in late 2004.
The structural (i.e., secular) factors provide greater
concern. For example, as an investor, I am less discouraged
by the market’s cyclical ups and downs. The
downs create buying opportunities through the temporary
misallocation of funds. However, if the long-term
returns of the market were somehow diminished, wealth
creation would surely suffer. Unfortunately this is
the case for the local economy. Reasons include:
- The persistent lagging performance of motor vehicle industry Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) versus the competition.
- The below average growth in human capital, specifically the proportion of college degrees awarded to Michigan residents vis-à-vis the nation.
- The greater outflow in publicly traded headquartered companies in Michigan versus new entrants, (i.e., new publicly traded IPOs), a reflection of slower small business expansion in higher growth industries.
- The tax structure, which lists Michigan as an
average state when ranked by competitiveness for
the cost of doing business.
Specific to the last item, Michigan formerly ranked
in the bottom quartile for competitiveness at the
beginning of the 1990s before significantly improving.
Most recently we have maintained our ranking by avoiding
raising major taxes such as property, personal income
and sales. However, being median is not sufficient
to promoting the needed catalyst for improving our
cyclical and structural prospects. The same can be
said about Lansing and the need to enhance its competitive
position.
The cyclical recovery that is normally present in
the ups and downs of the economic cycle has been slow
to start, but nevertheless has gained some traction
in the last six months. The structural impediments
to above average long-term growth remain sobering
for anyone who seeks a high quality of life in our
regional economy.
return
to top
|